Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin opens new affordable housing development in Southeast Austin
- Landmark commission says goodbye to Nau’s Enfield Drug
- After a decline last year, Travis County homeowners should expect a return to rising property taxes
- ZAP Commission forwards recommendation allowing some commercial uses in residential zones
- Ryan Alter and colleagues propose revision of boards and commissions
-
Discover News By District
City joins battle against controversial Hays development
Wednesday, December 3, 2008 by Austin Monitor
The City of
The partnership proposes to build 1,377 homes on 607 acres at 6327 FM 967. Developers asked for authorization to dump 330,000 gallons of treated domestic wastewater per day (120 million gallons a year) via surface irrigation across 122.37 acres. The area covered by the proposed permit is in
City staff this week sent a memo to the Mayor and Council along with City Manager Marc Ott, outlining concerns raised by the Watershed Protection and Development Review Department. In the memo, Assistant City Attorney Holly Noelke said the city had previously filed comments regarding the TLAP permit for land application of 330,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater.
She noted that though the TCEQ Executive Director made several changes in response to city’s comments, the October 30, 2008 revised draft permit and Executive Director’s response to comments “did not adequately address the environmental sensitivity of the area that would be subject to the permit.”
In the memo, Noelke said, “While land application technology may be appropriate and is preferable to direct discharge, the soils, rock outcrops, terrain, and topography of the Recharge Zone present challenges. Few other land application permits have been approved on the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. As such, the city has requested that TCEQ provide adequate safeguards for operating the facility commensurate with the location and size of the project.”
The BSEACD had similar concerns when it voted earlier this month to request the hearing. District General Manager Kirk Holland said the TCEQ preferred punitive action –sanctioning Jeremiah Venture’s developers after a violation – rather than taking steps to prevent pollution of the aquifer in the first place.
Both BSEACD and the city have concerns, in part, because of a recent ruling in a similar case involving the Belterra development in
The requests for the contested case hearing will be placed on the TCEQ’s agenda, and if granted, would be referred the State Office of Administrative hearings.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?