Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin opens new affordable housing development in Southeast Austin
- Landmark commission says goodbye to Nau’s Enfield Drug
- Congress Avenue transformation plan gets support from Urban Transportation Commission
- After a decline last year, Travis County homeowners should expect a return to rising property taxes
- Ryan Alter and colleagues propose revision of boards and commissions
-
Discover News By District
Council to consider Villa Muse release from ETJ
Thursday, January 31, 2008 by Austin Monitor
The Austin City Council today will consider a resolution instructing the City Manager to begin discussions with the developers of Villa Muse, a proposed film studio and mixed-use project in eastern
The developers of the project are seeking to have their land removed from the city’s extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ), but at least one Council Member is not convinced that a release would be in the city’s best interests.
Developers say they should be released from the city’s land use regulation and taxing authority in order to save the city the expense of extending utilities to the site. “The Villa Muse property is 4.5 miles east of the city limits, so we’re at a point where
“What we’ve asked for is a release from that ETJ so we can move forward and build out that private infrastructure ourselves at our cost, so
After the project is completed, Alvarado-Dykstra said, the developers would be open to the possibility of having the property brought into the city limits. “At the end of the day, after we’ve created this new tax base, then
But Council Member Lee Leffingwell told In Fact Daily he is not convinced the project should be released from the city’s regulatory authority. “There are two basic reasons they want the release: They don’t have to pay
Leffingwell pointed out that the Council had established a policy last October governing such requests, “and they don’t meet the threshold criterion, which is before we release land from our jurisdiction, it has to be a piece of land that we don’t ever plan to annex,” he said. “Obviously this can be annexed, it’s on the SH 130 corridor and will be a valuable part of our tax base. As I told one of the people who’s backing this project, I think it would be an abrogation of my fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers just to cede that land when we know it’s going to be very valuable as a tax base.”
If the Council does eventually decide to pursue a release, there is a procedure laid out in city policy. The proposal would have to go before both the Environmental Board and the Planning Commission before returning to the Council for a final vote.
“It’s very environmentally sensitive,” Leffingwell said of the Villa Muse site. “A large part of it is in the flood plain…and as I understand it, they’re talking about huge flood plain modifications, and that’s something that I would not like to see the city lose oversight of. We don’t want to give up our environmental controls.”
Leffingwell plans to offer some additional language to the resolution posted on today’s agenda. “The resolution is going to say we want the city to begin discussions with them to see how we can accommodate their goals, but with the idea that they remain in
Developers hope to have a report back to the Council on those discussions by early March, in time to make an announcement about the project during South by Southwest. “There are obviously things they want to look at regarding the kinds of things we want to do,” said Alvarado-Dykstra. “That’s the kind of stuff we’re looking forward to providing assurances about.”
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?