Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin unveils how light-rail could change the city in new report with detailed maps
- Dirty no more? City opts to keep Sixth Street open to traffic at all times
- Lost Creek neighborhood sues city over tax efforts
- Density proponents encouraged by HOME six-month progress report
- Most Austin-area drivers will still need a vehicle inspection. Here’s where the rules have changed.
-
Discover News By District
Popular Whispers
- SBA issues grant to open office for women entrepreneurs in Austin
- DAA lunch talk looks at future of I-35 amid expansion, cap-and-stitch concerns
- City is preserving affordable housing near the Domain
- Report: Austin home prices grew 85 percent since 2014
- Share your thoughts on CapMetro’s proposed upgrades for payment options
City’s lawsuit against billboard company at standstill
Tuesday, September 8, 2009 by John Davidson
A lawsuit the City of
The city filed suit in April against Reagan Advertising, a company that owns billboards on land the city purchased last year in northwest
In July 2008, the city told Reagan that it was terminating the leases, but Reagan sent rent checks to the city on Aug. 1 and Dec. 1, 2008, that covered 12-month terms, respectively. The city received and deposited these checks, according to court records, but then filed suit on April 3, 2009, claiming Reagan was trespassing on city land and that it had not paid rent.
Reagan had sent the checks to Austin Energy–to the same address the company claims it had previously sent rent on other city-owned properties. An affidavit by Junie Marie Plummer, a city real estate services agent, states that she found out about the rent payments in July 2009–months after the city had already filed its lawsuit against Reagan.
For its part, Reagan’s attorneys claim that the city invalidated its claim to terminate the leases by accepting rent. Furthermore, Reagan’s attorneys say the city never sent written notice of their intention to end the lease, as required in the land covenants.
At this point, the lawsuit is at a standstill and no trial date has been set.
“We’re in the process of talking through a possible resolution with the city,” said J. Allen Smith, an attorney for Reagan. “We’re trying to see if there’s something we can work out with the city. We’re hoping to see if we can sit down with the city and work something out before we spend more time and energy on this.”
Asked for a comment on the suit, a city spokesperson issued a statement saying only that “Reagan National’s billboards are trespassing on City property,” and that “discovery is ongoing.”
The land in question is part of 92 undeveloped acres in northwest
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?