Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Cap Metro to shelve 46 new electric buses for a year after manufacturer bankruptcy
- Mobility Committee hears public concern regarding expansion of MoPac
- Red River music proponents see city funding as sign of support, progress
- Austin Energy proposes gas peaker units, not larger combined cycle plant
- Ethics complaint against Watson campaign still unsettled after hearing
-
Discover News By District
Japan catastrophe amplifies local debate over expanded nuclear power
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 by Josh Rosenblatt
As Japanese officials struggle to contain fires and a potential core meltdown at the earthquake- and tsunami-damaged
NRG Energy, one of the owners of the South Texas Project in
Tom “Smitty” Smith of government-watchdog group Public Citizen told In Fact Daily he hopes the recent plant explosions in
Smith said that the situation in
“One of the contentions that’s being played out right now is the question of whether it is possible to appropriately control a reactor after a fire and explosion and in particular if you can control multiple reactors after one of them has begun to melt down at that site,” said Smith. “And the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has already signaled they want to consider that issue while reviewing for the licensure of the new
But NRG Director of Communications David Knox said it’s important to withhold judgment on the situation in
“We feel there will time in the days and weeks to come to assess any impact on nuclear developments this disaster will have,” Knox said. “We want to take the time and understand what is actually happening, and we would recommend that everyone takes those days and weeks to assess what impact this has on everything. Our focus right now is on the safety of our friends and partners in
Knox did confirm a report that talks between NRG and CPS Energy of
“We’ve been talking with CPS Energy about power-purchase agreements — what we were talking about with Austin Energy — and CPS and us mutually agreed to put things on hold for a little while and wait for the days and weeks so that we can assess if there is any impact on nuclear development,” Knox said. “So our conversations with CPS and Austin Energy are on hold, and while we have submitted a proposal to AE, it’s my understanding that they are considering that proposal.”
Or as NRG President of Advanced Technology Initiatives Juan Garza put it, “We were in a standstill with Austin Energy before, and we remain in a standstill with them.”
Austin Energy spokesman Ed Clark told In Fact Daily that developments in
“We needed some time to upload our load forecast and go through the processes to look at our needs and growth potential,” Clark said. “We told them a month ago we were going to take a few months. Nothing has changed; there was nothing ongoing.
“The
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?