Dockless bikes are (maybe) coming to Austin. But first, let’s talk it out.

Nobody wants to be the withholding stepparent.

That’s why, when dockless bike companies Ofo and Spin rolled out during South by Southwest last year, they put the city in a tough spot. Austin, which markets itself as an innovative, tech-savvy city, had to stifle two seemingly forward-thinking tech startups during a festival that’s been a launchpad for so many others. But there was no getting around it – literally, in some cases.

Unlike Austin’s B-cycle, the smartphone-enabled rental bikes don’t have to be dropped off at a docking station. The bikes were unregulated and unvetted by the city and ended up obstructing sidewalks. But, while Ofo’s bikes were cited, the Austin Transportation Department reached a deal with Spin, allowing its bikes to roll along for the final days of the festival.

Since that soft launch at SXSW, dockless bike companies have sprung up in other cities – most notably Washington, D.C., Seattle and Dallas. And today, City Council will weigh whether to give an OK to a pilot program that looks to build upon those cities’ (often viral) missteps.

As the “drop it when you’re done” bike model has mushroomed across the U.S., cities have greeted these programs with caution.

D.C. is asking residents to test out and provide feedback on five dockless bike-shares over a seven-month pilot period. Seattle’s dockless bike pilot ended in December, but the bikes will stick around at least another six more months. In the meantime, the city will analyze the data it collected during the pilot before giving the go-ahead to permanent rules.

The benefit to the bikes are their convenience: You can open up an app and find one near you wherever you go. That benefit is also a detriment: If you can find them everywhere, they’re probably going to end up in some weird places.

They’ve been found on roadsides in D.C., stacked in gnarled masses along Seattle sidewalks and dumped in lakes in Dallas.

#Seattle’s bike-sharing program is going well in #ballard pic.twitter.com/mTlTqHiQgj

— Thomas Brew (@thomasbrew) November 2, 2017

Last month, the Dallas city manager sent a letter to the five dockless bike-share companies operating there telling them they had three weeks to move bikes from sidewalks, roads and trails. The National Park Service has impounded a dozen abandoned bikes near national monuments. And Seattle’s transportation department is leery of whether providers will comply with city ordinances, if the city decides to give the OK to a permanent program.

So, Austin is taking a decidedly less precarious route: Rubber won’t hit the road until Austinites have their say.

“What we’re proposing is to look at developing a demonstration pilot as informed by a public engagement process,” said Laura Dierenfield with the Transportation Department. “So that would offer a way for interested companies to operate in Austin on a pilot basis, but that would only be after we conduct a public engagement process to better inform the terms and framework.”

So far, the department has been in contact with Spin, Zagster, LimeBike, Ofo, Dropbike, Mobike and Garland-based VBikes, Dierenfield said. And, she said, the department is taking cues from cities already spoke-deep in ire surrounding the errant bikes, like using innate GPS connectivity to monitor which bikes are sitting idle for an extended period of time.

“The idea is to be able to see problems quickly, address them quickly, and then incentivize companies and users to maintain good order going forward,” Dierenfield said.

The Austin City Council will also vote on expanding the city’s current, station-based bike-share system, B-Cycle, by hoping to leverage federal transportation grant money to fund its goal of adding an 18 additional stations – five of which have already been built out – to its current 54-station system. The idea behind the expansion is to create a “hybrid” system, Dierenfield said, with the dockless bikes picking up slack for the B-cycle kiosks, which are largely centrally located.

“Looking at a hybrid system could have the potential benefit of having even further access to bikes,” she said. “But it’s important to really think through how that system would be managed so that there is that predictability and not any added nuisance to having accessibility to bikes beyond where the stations exist.”

Oddly enough, Dierenfield said, the department is also considering applying a key facet of the B-cycle model to a possible dockless bike program: designated parking areas.

This story has been modified since publication to clarify that the B-Cycle expansion is already underway.

Audrey McGlinchy contributed to this report. This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT. Photo by Jorge Sanhueza-Lyon/KUT.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.