Photo by Our Future 35/City of Austin. An illustration of what a cap might look like over I-35 between 11th and 12th streets. The city is considering up to 26.6 acres of highway decks, but must vote in late May on where to build infrastructure to hold up the decks themselves.
Austin has only weeks to decide where to put parks over I-35
Austin must decide within just a few weeks whether to commit hundreds of millions of dollars to installing support structures on Interstate 35, or give up the chance to build parks over the highway.
Without those support structures, any caps over the soon-to-be-lowered highway– and the parks, plazas, buildings and public spaces envisioned for them – would be physically impossible. The chance to add support structures wouldn’t reappear for at least 50 years.
Our Future 35/City of Austin. A slide from a city presentation showing the location of each proposed cap and stitch totaling 26.6 acres. A stitch is simply a highway cap under 300 feet wide and doesn’t require the same infrastructure as a larger cap like fire extinguishers, ventilation fans and catchment systems for any hazardous materials spilled by vehicles.
The load-bearing infrastructure doesn’t come cheap. The cost of just the foundational elements is estimated at $284 million.
The full build-out of the support structures, the decks and all the amenities, including splash pads and amphitheaters, is estimated to hit $1.4 billion. The price tag could double if the city waits too long to pay for caps, the city’s top transportation official warned at a Tuesday briefing.
Those construction costs don’t include the yearly expenses of keeping the infrastructure in good repair and running the niceties on top of the highway decks. Annual operations and maintenance is estimated at $47 million.
Our Future 35/City of Austin. A rendering of a deck installed over I-35 between Fourth and Seventh streets. This highway park would have live music venues and feed off the nightlife buzz of Sixth Street and the Red River area.
As the clock ticks toward this high-stakes decision, the mayor and 10-member City Council are already confronting a serious and growing cash crunch.
Budget officials alerted Council members Tuesday that Austin is $5.7 million short of the $1.42 billion planned to be spent on city government operations in 2025. The lack of cash is largely because of lower-than-expected sales tax collections.
Without hacking off significant pieces of city government or getting approval from voters to increase property taxes, the budget deficit will only grow. By 2030, city officials project Austin’s annual budget would be $80 million in the red.
Paying for deck infrastructure by issuing bonds would eat into Austin’s borrowing capacity, leaving less room for roads, parks, affordable housing and a bevy of other priorities being considered for a 2026 bond election. Bonds are a type of loan where investors lend money to government agencies with a promise the cash will be paid back with interest.
The capping project is being considered only because the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is sinking the main lanes of I-35 below ground level from Holly Street to Airport Boulevard. The lowered lanes are part of a historic expansion that includes adding two high-occupancy vehicle lanes through the busiest part of the interstate in Austin.
Nathan Bernier/KUT News. TxDOT’s I-35 plans involve tearing down the upper decks and lowering the main lanes beneath ground level, creating an opportunity to cover the sunken lanes with giant lids called “caps.”
The I-35 Capital Express Central project will add 32 miles of lanes from Ben White Boulevard to U.S. Highway 290 East, widening the highway that opened in 1962 along a historic racial segregation line known as East Avenue. For some members of Council, the caps are a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to stitch together pieces of the city divided for decades.
“Everything we do, there’s some implication that ties back to city-sanctioned segregation that split the city in half,” Council Member Natasha Harper-Madison said.
Other Council members were excited about the economic development that acres of prime downtown real estate out of thin air could attract – and even help pay for the project.
“It’s just such a tremendous opportunity,” Council Member Chito Vela said. “If you’re bullish on Austin’s future, you support the caps.”
Not all Council members were so enthusiastic. District 6’s Krista Laine said Austin had to foot a bigger share of the bill than cities with similar projects in other states, which she cautioned should be a sign that the “trade-offs are too great.”
“We will be foreclosing our ability to spend on other critical needs all over the city at a time when our residents will need Austin to be able to have funds available for these emergent needs,” Laine said. “We have to preserve the flexibility for our local community.”
City of Austin. A ground-level view of a proposed Third Street promenade that would cross I-35 on the Cesar Chavez to Fourth Street cap.
Even if Council approves the support structures, it’s still unclear how the city would pay for them.
The only firm commitment so far is a low-interest $41 million state infrastructure loan from TxDOT.
A much-needed $105 million federal grant awarded for the Cesar Chavez to Fourth Street cap was frozen for review by the Trump administration. City officials expect to know in May whether they’ll get the money.
Amid the uncertainty, one major player has already locked in its plans. The University of Texas System voted in December to spend $106 million on support structures for its portion of I-35 from Dean Keeton to 15th Street. That stretch could eventually add 13 acres and bridge UT athletic facilities on both sides of the highway.
Next up, City Council is scheduled to meet May 6 for a deeper conversation about how much the city can borrow.
The big vote is expected May 22 when Council will also decide whether to pay for any decks now, locking in the price tag before the costs go up.
This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?
Austin City Council: The Austin City Council is the body with legislative purview over the City of Austin. It offers policy direction, while the office of the City Manager implements administrative actions based on those policies. Until 2015, the body contained seven members, including the city's Mayor, all elected at-large. In 2012, City of Austin residents voted to change that system and as of 2015, 10 members of the Council are elected based on geographic districts. The Mayor continues to be elected at-large.
TxDOT: The transportation agency for the State of Texas.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.